April 2020 | NTIA Technical Report JR-20-549
Jeanne Quimby; Jeffrey A. Jargon; Rod Leonhardt; Jacob D. Rezac; Paul D. Hale; Kate A. Remley; Amanda Koepke; Sarah Streett; Robert T. Johnk; Chriss A. Hammerschmidt; Paul M. McKenna; Irena Stange; Mike Chang; Nicholas DeMinco; Joseph E. Diener; Richard Chad Smith; Christopher Hoyt; Sofia Springer
Abstract: Channel modeling often provides a basis for the design and deployment of wireless technology. Engineers design systems to operate under certain expected channel conditions. Channel models are typically based on the statistics of a collection of many measurements performed by channel sounders in nominally similar radio-propagation environments. In 2016, researchers at the US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Institute for Telecommunication Sciences (ITS) began a collaboration to conduct a series of channel sounder verifications to identify sources of uncertainty due to systematic and random effects in a channel sounder hardware. This report describes conducted-channel measurements designed to focus on errors within the channel sounding hardware as a base-line test of the channel sounder’s performance. Repeat measurements and an analysis of the random components of uncertainty were performed. Sample results are reported and analyzed. The work concludes with guidance and best-practice procedures with the intent of allowing users to perform similar verifications of their channel sounders.
Keywords: channel modeling; propagation measurement; confidence region; channel sounder; metrology; path gain measurements; conducted channel measurements; measurement uncertainty analysis; propagation measurement best practices
For technical information concerning this report, contact:
Paul M. McKenna
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, components, and software may be identified in this report to specify adequately the technical aspects of the reported results. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, nor does it imply that the equipment or software identified is necessarily the best available for the particular application or uses.